Wireline automation systems and methods

ABSTRACT

In conventional wireline intervention shifting service, the success of the operation is heavily dependent on the engineer’s experience and knowledge. Any wrong judgement in the process of operation could lead to non-productive time or even total failure. Once the operation is completed, the post-job processing and report preparation also require significant manual effort and are extremely time consuming, which often leads to the inadequate or incomplete report. These challenges are addressed by the advanced surface acquisition software presented in this paper. The aim of the surface software is to redefine the selective shifting workflow by leveraging the available instrumentation, streamlining and simplifying operation procedures, eliminating or reducing the typical human errors observed earlier, and greatly reducing the burden on the field engineers for post-job deliverables with automated real-time data collection, processing, and report generation.

BACKGROUND Field

The present disclosure generally relates to wireline automation systems and methods.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The wireline shifting tool string normally include one or more anchor modules, a linear actuator module, and a shifter with its key matching the target profile, as illustrated in FIG. 1 .

Initial conveyance of the downhole shifting tool string to the target depth (i.e., getting the shifter close to the shifting target) is critical for successful shifting. In conventional shifting operation, it is possible to miss the collar joint, waste considerable time finding the location, or even perform the operation at the wrong location. Completion mapping depth correlation based on the operator-provided completion table creates a channel similar to a casing collar locator (CCL) recording and enables side-by-side correlation directly on the depth log. The completion-based depth control process renders details of the well completion mapping and the shifting tool string on the same graph, thus visualizes the relative locations of the tool string, the shifting target, and the collar joints in real time and making the depth control intuitive and straightforward.

Once the tool is close to the shifting target, latching to the shifting profile is an operation outside wireline standard workflows and requires extreme finesse and control. With the newly introduced advanced software, the user can initiate automated seeking function to locate and latch the shifter key onto the target profile reliably and efficiently. The system enabled the unprecedented position of the tool with an accuracy of few mm in any well including Extended-Reach Drilling (ERD) and wells intervened on a floating installation.

Then, with the shifting control panel, user can open/close the valve in power mode or high accuracy mode with mm shifter displacement accuracy providing detailed valve status.

Throughout the workflow, the critical data and the result for each user operation are logged and displayed in a two-dimensional plot and customized table. The user can generate a detailed operation report that includes all the relevant information.

Challenge #1: Precise Depth Control for Tool String Conveyance

One of the biggest challenges in shifting operation is to convey the tool string to the vicinity of the target to be shifted, which is usually at a location so that the shifter is about 20 feet above or below the target in the well. In conventional shifting operation, this can be an extremely difficult task for the field engineer, especially in the situation that a CCL reference log for the well is not available. Without correlation run, the engineer cannot trust the depth reading from winch and will have to perform manual correlation based on the completion mapping information provided for the well. To do that, the engineer must dig through the completion mapping file line by line and crunch the numbers of the pipe joint intervals on a piece of paper, then comparing to the moving CCL log on the computer screen. The whole process is very tedious and error prone as there is a lot of manual computation dealing with a lot of numbers, and the engineer has to go back and forth between paper and computer screen. A slight misstep could lead to missing joint for the correlation and put the shifter dozens of feet off from the target depth.

Despite effort made on surface system integration test (SIT), the major contributor to miss run and non-productive time (NPT) was the depth control. This aspect cannot be replicated at surface yet create a real difficulty. Several SITs are made using cable flagging providing information on shifting key placement within centimeter of the valve to be shifted. This precious information helping client and service company to make an efficient SIT are not available in operational context @ 20,000 to 30,000 ft to the decision maker (Engineer, Company man). The challenge of latching and its uncertainty is explained in Reference [1]. Latch characterizations take time and high-resolution investigation is around 1 ft. It is then critical to start this step only once due diligence on depth control is made and tool is on the proper joint.

To understand the challenge of depth control, the elasticity of the cable, its friction against well bore as well as the large tension difference between RIH (Gravity driven) and POOH (Surface induced motion) need to be realized. FIG. 2 is an example of different tag and pick up (blue, green, and brown). The point where BHA leave the ground cannot be defined precisely. At this depth elasticity of the cable make surface measurement (on the winch) disconnected from downhole status.

The several examples below demonstrate the criticality of depth determination.

This first example (FIG. 3 ) illustrates the reason for accurate depth determination. Some specific Isolation valve has little tolerance on debris. When engaging into planning a ball shifting operation the HUD is the very first step to be planned. It determines if cleaning services is required. We here are making a macro view on downhole interaction. The success of shifting depend on assurance that the key can reach its profile hence precisely defining the HUD.

The 2^(nd) example (see FIG. 4 ) illustrates the hysteresis of 2 down passes that were correlated on a pip tag 100 ft above Target. We can see that even if that more than 25,000 - 28,000 ft of cable potential stretch was deemed to be covered by the pip tag reference. The 2 tag demonstrate the hysteresis of at least 3 ft over a travel of 100 ft from a known reference. On the right the same two down pass tags were correlated to the deepest known element from the lower completion leaving only 3 ft to the counterwheel. The conclusion is only the CCL combined with head tension resolves the HUD. Surface tension measurement don’t bring enough variation to reach this level of accuracy.

In the 3rd example (see FIG. 5 ), client requested a shifting operation after 1 week of unsuccessful shift and several million Dollar of Rig cost with another service provider. The depth control run reveals that the HUD was 7 ft above target (ball valve) giving absolutely no chance for a shift. Reason for the issue was a procedure referring to a pip tag located on upper completion which were off in addition to poor CCL resolution on Chrome completion. The conclusion of Example #2 is CCL is the most accurate method for depth determination. The CCL need to be set at the deepest point of the BHA possible to reduce potential uncertainty from tally and correlated with the Completion where the Shifting element is mounted as opposed to upper completion.

In the fourth example (see FIG. 6 ), a severe injection rate combine with completion variation was giving lot of unknown cable stretch. Once again a proper operation planning using the CCL anticipation combined with head tension confirmed the latch of the BHA in the proper joint. The inch-worm characterisation technique provide clear resolution to limit our time exposure.

The examples presented here prove CCL and head tension are the most critical parameter for depth determination. Unlike winch depth measurement located 30,000 ft above, affected by drag, friction, and stretch, the CCL along with the head tension are the true connection with the completion hardware joint and cross-over. They are the only true indication of tool position. Depth understanding is best estimated as BHA travel from last know CCL signature.

The previously example were made using las/dlis file from the field jobs and Techlog postprocessing. The following innovation describes how the critical correlation can now be done by shifting software, which is accessible onsite at wireline unit or from remote operation and providing well site immediate diagnostic without compromising depth accuracy. This is a huge step ahead into de-risking shifting operation and reducing NPT.

To address this challenge, the completion mapping based correlation process is embedded into the software as part of the shifting operation workflow:

-   1) Import completion mapping file into the software system and     create data channels and logs that can help real-time correlation on     acquisition log. -   2) Implement Depth Control UI that integrates both completion     mapping and tool string details with real-time movement for visual     correlation and depth control.

The excel file for completion mapping takes 5 fields - Depth, ID, OD, QT, and Description. Ideally, each entry for the table denotes a well shape change. ID is the inner diameter of the section. OD is the outer diameter of the section. QT is the number of repeated components for the section, or the number of repeated casing segments. Description marks the type of the component, and the Depth is the top depth for that component. This excel file is imported to the shifting software.

FIG. 7 gives an example of completion mapping input table and the expected log output. Assume the targe sliding sleeve locates between depth 5890 feet to 6070 feet, and there are 6 subcomponents in between. For each one of the components, ID, OD, QT and Description are input in the table. With this information, the software will draw the well shape in the depth log shown in FIG. 7(B). The purple line draws the inner diameter of the well, and the green line draws the outer diameter. Red marks indicate where are the expected Casing Collar Locator. The purple texts indicate the type of well components and their location.

Besides, the CCL log is put in the middle of the well ID and OD drawing to help with the correlation as shown in FIG. 8 . In case offset between the CCL log and the completion mapping is observed, the operator can adjust the winch depth measurement to remove the offset, via a simple button click on the UI (See FIG. 9 ). When CCL reference log is not available, this could be an effective alternate for depth correlation. In FIG. 2 , the CCL log is quite well aligned with the well completion mapping. Furthermore, the CCL log clearly indicates each well ID or OD change in the log, due to the highly sensitive CCL sensor used downhole.

A few more custom UIs are in place to further assist depth control operation.

The engineer first specifies the profile depth and the target depth (initial conveyance depth for shifter, which is usually a few feet below the profile depth for seeking up operation, or a few feet above the profile depth for seeking down operation) in the well through the Tool Position UI shown in 10.

Next, the engineer can open the Depth Control Panel shown in 11.

The well rendering is based on the imported completion mapping information as described in the previous section. Every pipe joint is drawn out with the proper inner and outer diameter ratio and with depth mark. The tool string inside the well is displayed with the important features shown at proper location, such as anchor arm and shifter dog. In addition, the CCL log is plotted at the side with the depth coordinate background. The various depth related numbers and messages are laid out in the right pane to give user the accurate depth information for tool movement. During the operation, the engineer can see the real time movement of the tool string in the well.

Combining completion mapping based log channels (FIG. 7(B) or FIG. 8 ) and the Depth Control Panel (FIG. 11 ), the engineer can monitor the tool string position and speed in the well, real time and all the time. These advanced software features simplify the operation of conveying the tool to the desired target depth and eliminate the risk of missing completion joints, by replacing manual paper and pencil method.

Challenge #2: Target Profile Seeking and Latching

Once the tool string is conveyed to the vicinity of the shifting target in the well, the next operation is to latch the shifter to the target profile. This operation has been performed manually by the experienced engineer with intense user intervention. The procedures involve manipulating each and all tool modules (anchor, linear actuator, and shifter) in specific sequence. Accidental deviation from the required sequence results re-run of the whole procedure. So, it often takes long time to successfully find and latch onto the target profile. It is not uncommon that the shifter key sometimes latches at wrong place due to user misjudgments and results failure of the shifting job.

To address this challenge, tool control automation is embedded to the surface software. This advanced software feature enables automatic seeking, latching, and even shifting of the target. The user only needs to provide several operational parameters to the “Parameters Input Field”, before hitting the “Start” button in the Automated-Seeking UI shown in FIG. 12 .

The software orchestrates the opening and closing of the anchor arm, the extension and retracting of the linear actuator, and the opening and closing of the shifter key, with user specified pressure and force. Under the software control, the downhole shifting tool string moves automatically in the inch-worming fashion, to look for the target nearby. If the shifter latching force limit is set high enough, the target can be automatically shifted after successful latching between the shifter key and the target profile.

While the software is controlling the downhole tool operation, the user can monitor the progress from the UI “Operation Log” message box shown in FIG. 6 . The UI “Critical Status Indicators” tell how many inch-worming steps are performed and if successful latching achieved or not. The UI “Data Gauges” section displays real time measurement for several critical data channels. The “Tool Display” section at the bottom of this UI gives visual cue for the opening dimension of the anchor and the shifter key, as well as the extension distance of the linear actuator.

Much more reliable and efficient job execution can be achieved with this software implemented automation, comparing to manual operation of the tool.

To better understand the downhole seeking and latching status, linear actuator force vs linear displacement 2D plot is available, allowing the user to monitor and identify latching signatures. For details, please refer to the Case Study section.

Challenge #3: Winch Seeking

When seeking with inch-worming movement described in previous section, the force reading from the linear actuator in the different stage of seeking operation can help engineer (or software, in the case of automated seeking) to decide if the shifter is correctly latched. This is not applicable when the seeking operation is performed with winch pull, since the linear actuator is not used for moving the shifter through the profile.

In winch seeking operation, knowing the shifter open diameter can greatly help the engineer understand better the shifter’s position inside the profile, since the different parts of profile have the different inner diameter. But due to the lack of downhole sensor to measure the shifter open diameter, it seems impossible to know the shifter diameter during the operation. This makes seeking with winch rather tricky operation as the determination of correct latch is a guesswork for the engineer.

One feature provided by the shifting software is called the profilometer mode, which can estimate the shifter open diameter from the shifter force reading. In the profilometer mode seeking, the shifter hydraulic chamber is isolated. When the tool string moves through the different sections of the profile, the shifter force will change accordingly with the ID of the sections. So, the well ID can be estimated from the shifter pressure. During the operation, the user inputs Seek Limit pressure and Initial Open Diameter as shown in 13. The shifter is first opened to the target pressure. The open diameter is estimated from the shifter force based on the hydraulic system design information. Then, the computation method is calibrated by comparing the estimated diameter with the user input known diameter. When the tool string is pulled by the winch to seek the target, the shifter open diameter is computed from the force measurement. Comparing the computed shifter open diameter with the known profile inner diameters of different sections, the engineer can tell where the shifter is inside the profile and if it is in the correct latch location.

FIG. 14 illustrates the effectiveness of the shifter open diameter measurement in profilometer mode. The profilometer mode is enabled when the shifter key is inside 3″ ID section, at the bottom of the completion. The tool is then pulled by the winch upwards, passing the targeted sliding sleeve and then a casing joint connecting 2 different sizes of casing. On the log at the left, the Computed Shifter Open Diameter measurement (in red) matches well with the user input Completion Mapping Well ID (in green). This gives the user confidence of the tool string location inside the well. It is important for winch-pulled seeking since there is no other good indicator to confirm the tool location. Winch depth measurement is too inaccurate for reliable shifting operation.

Note that the profilometer mode and the shifter open diameter measurement is a useful tool for inch-worming seeking or tractor-conveyed seeking.

Challenge #4: Client Report

Historically, for either on-the-job troubleshooting or after-job deliverable preparation, the engineers need to go through the whole context of operation, look at the various data channels on the log, try to interpret the events and make the necessary annotation on the log. The whole process is labor intensive, time consuming, and error prone. This is especially true for complex and long-lasting jobs.

To address this issue, an automated real-time reporting tool is built into the surface software as part of integral shifting workflow. A data interpretation module is designed and implemented to mimic what the engineer used to do: correlate the tool operational status with relevant data channels from the downhole tools, interpret and record key operational events together with essential real time measurements at the events. Shifting Deliverable Logging UI shown in FIG. 75 tabulates the events and related information per event in chronological order, real time during the job. This logging table is also available after the job, as part of the job deliverables. User can save the table as pdf file or print it as hard copy for future reference.

There are three types of events being logged onto Shifting Deliverable Logging Table. The first event type is the operation of the shifting modules, such as opening/closing anchor, extending/retracting linear actuator, and seeking/shifting with shifter. The second event type is the updates of the completion component information, such as manufacturer, part number, size of any completion component in the well. These updates are necessary when the operating engineer or client noticed error in the completion mapping input information. The third event type is the start/stop of the station log, which correlates the operation events with the relevant station log graphs.

Challenge #5: Troubleshooting and Reliability Improvement

The hydraulic system in the downhole shifting tool string malfunctions sometimes. The most common issue is clogged solenoids, which causes inability to control hydraulic pressure in the system and ends up with the tool modules not operating properly, such as not being able to open the anchor, or not being able to move the linear actuator. Often time the solenoids can be unclogged without opening the tools. Instead, toggling the solenoids on and off while the motor is running and trying to build up pressure in the tool, can flush the debris away from the solenoids and resume normal tool functionality. But the solenoids need to be manipulated in defined sequence to achieve the flushing purpose. This requires the user to control the motor and each solenoid one by one, step by step. The process is time consuming and error prone.

The software comes to the rescue once again, by automating the process. The automation is implemented in two stages: individual solenoid flushing or flushing all solenoids. The following sequence is programmed to flush individual solenoid:

-   Turn on all the solenoids -   Turn on motor to build pressure on the hydraulic bus to targe value     (e.g. 7500 psi) -   Turn off individual solenoid that need to be flushed

By click “Flush All” button on Shifting Automated Flushing UI (see FIG. 86 ) above sequence is automatically repeated for every single solenoid.

It is worth noting that this UI interface is generated during software run-time, to represent the proper solenoid configuration for the specific tool string composition. When tool string changes, such as adding or removing an anchor, the UI updates accordingly to add or remove solenoid inside the anchor.

Case Study - Shifting Sliding Sleeve

The following section presents test results from a system integration test performed at surface. The test setup consisted of a 333 ft long completion, including the following sections in order from one end to the other end:

-   - 233 ft of 7″ tubing (6″ ID) -   - 43 ft long 4.5″ tubing (3.9″ ID) -   - 43 ft long 3.5″ (2.99″ ID) -   - 5 ft long sliding sleeve (2.8″ ID) -   - 6 ft long 3.5″ tubing (2.99″ ID)

The completion schematic with the different tubing IDs is presented in 7. The completion mapping information was uploaded into the software per FIG. 9 1.

The wireline tool string used in this test consisted of a 4-section tractor, followed by the shifting tool modules.

The depth control panel was used to display the shifting tool string inside the completion, as shown in FIG. 108 Depth Control Panel8. The position of the tool string was defined per the winch depth measurement and an offset correction. The depth of the end of the last 6 ft long 3.5″ tubing was set as 10,302 ft artificially, for the sake of testing. A CCL signal track is displayed next to the completion schematic. The tool string bottom is displayed in purple. From the purple line upwards, it shows the shifter, anchor, and tractor. The key mechanical features on the tool string are emphasized in the drawing with protruding shapes along the tool body at the proper location. Examples are shifter key, anchor arms, and tractor wheels. Also, a horizontal line across the tool body represents the position of the CCL sensor. Everything in the graph is drawn to scale for easy visual correlation

The objectives of the test were to use the depth control panel to deliver the tool 7 ft above the sliding sleeve lower profile and then start the automated seeking/shifting sequence to latch and shift the sliding sleeve down to open. The system integration test was started with the tool string inserted at the uphole end of the tubing. The tractor was used to tractor down. Refer to FIG. 119 below. The representation of the wireline tool as the bottom of the tool string approaching the 7″ to 4.5″ casing joint is shown in Caption A. As the CCL module passes through the 7″ to 4.5″ casing joint, the CCL signal was recorded on the right track (refer to Caption B). In Caption C, the tractor controls were set so the tractor stalled at the restriction as the most bottom drive hit the restriction. Tractor navigation was engaged to pass the restriction. The first drive was closed while the other three drives were kept open. This allowed the tool string to move forward till the 2^(nd) drive hit the restriction (refer to caption D).

The tractor navigation sequence was continued by opening the first drive and closing the second drive and by tractoring down again. This allowed the tool to move down til the 3^(rd) drive hit the restriction (refer to caption E in FIG. 2020 ). The 2^(nd) drive was opened, the 3^(rd) drive was closed. This allowed the tool to move down to till the 4th drive hit the restriction (refer to caption F).

At this point the shifting tool was opened in seek mode. In this mode the shifting tool is compliant. It incorporates a suspension system that allows it to compress to pass through restrictions or expand into openings. The 3^(rd) tractor drive was opened, and the 4^(th) most upper drive was closed. The tractor was started, and the tool moved down until the tractor stalled (refer to caption G). Higher tractoring force was selected. This caused the shifting tool to be compressed and pass the 4.5″ to 3.5″ restriction. In seek mode, a profilometer option can be used to isolate the hydraulic chamber in the shifting tool. Fluctuation of the pressure then gives an indication of the change in diameter. The indirect ID measured by the tool going from the 4.5″ to 3.5″ tubing is presented in FIG. 2020 Caption G and H.

The shifting tool diameter change measurement can be used to measure change in diameter up to 1″. In this case the shifting is compressed from 3.9″ diameter to 2.99″. This measurement is another indicator that help locate the tool string in the completion. In FIG. 21 the ID of the completion tubing obtained from user provide completion mapping input is shown in green. The ID measurement is shown in red. The shifting tool was opened near the end and inside of the 4.5″ tubular. As it is compressed to pass through the restriction and enter the 3.5″ tubular the measurement changes from ~3.9″ to ~2.99″.

After the shifting tool indicates that it passed the restricition and entered the 3.5″ tubing, the next indication came from the CCL module passing through the 4.5″ to 3.5″ casing joints (refer to caption I in FIG. 22 ). Then the tractor stalled when the most bottom drive hit the 4.5″ to 3.5″ restriction (refer to Caption J). The tractor navigation was executed. The 4^(th) and last drive hit the restriction and was the last indication before the shifting tool would enter the sliding sleeve (refer to Caption K).

In this test, the depth control panel along with the CCL signal, the tractor motor stall indicator and the shifting tool ID measurement were used to confidently deliver the shifting tool 5 feet above the sliding sleeve.

The shifting tool pressure was increased then to use it as an anchor and prevent tool string sliding inside the tubing. The tractor drives were closed. Afterwards, the rest of the operation was completed using the automated seeking/shifting sequence. The sequence consists of activating the tool by preselecting parameter so that it moves in an inch-worm motion toward the profile, latch and shift the sleeve. The UI was described earlier in the document. In this case, the downhole direction was selected, a Seek Pressure Limit of 400 psi was used, a Shift Pressure Limit (shifter used as an anchor phase) of 2500 psi, the Anchor Open Force Limit set to 8000 lbf and the Auto-Seeking Latch Force Limit was set to 4000 lbf. By setting the auto-seeking latch force limit to 4000lbf the shifting tool did not stop after latching on the profile and before shifting the sleeve. It latched and shifted the sleeve without stopping.

As the tool was inch-worming downward towards the sleeve profile, the 2D plot of linear actuator force and displacement vs accumulated displacement is used to track the progress as shown in FIG. 2424 . The first 4 cycles of inch-worming are in display. The blue line going upward is the phase in which the shifting tool is translating downward. The blue line going down is the phase where the tool is repositioning the anchor forward.

FIG. 135 shows the last two extension cycles in which the shifting tool latched and shifted the sleeve. The first increase to 2000 lbf in the linear actuator force represents the shifting tool latching and starting to shift the sleeve. In the next extension cycle, variations in the linear actuator force are recognized and confirm having shifted the sleeve.

Conclusion and Future Enhancement

The advanced software features presented here are essential to address some long-standing challenges for wireline shifting services. These features mainly aim to automate the critical steps of shifting operational workflow. The automation helps to greatly improve the reliability, efficiency, and service quality of the wireline shifting jobs.

One-click operation is envisioned to be the ultimate future of shifting operation. This requires fully automated tool conveyance over the wireline. So, the automated winch operation needs to be incorporated into the workflow. More intelligent decision-making method will likely be needed, to identify different phases of the operation. For example, AI based pattern recognition can be used to confirm successful latching to the target, by analyzing real-time force vs displacement waveform using pre-trained algorithm. Further improvement on linear actuator displacement measurement is going to be beneficial too, to allow micro-level correlation with sub-millimeter grade accuracy. This can potentially be achieved by fusing multiple measurements, including the accelerometer measurement, the tractor speed, the pumping motor speed of the shifting tool, and the winch depth measurement.

Meanwhile, some of the new features presented in this paper can be utilized on other wireline services as well, such as perforation, plug setting, and mechanical slot cutter. All these services require precise depth control. The visually intuitive depth control UIis directly applicable to them. The real-time or after-job tabulated operational report is also very useful.

Language of degree used herein, such as the terms “approximately,” “about,” “generally,” and “substantially” as used herein represent a value, amount, or characteristic close to the stated value, amount, or characteristic that still performs a desired function or achieves a desired result. For example, the terms “approximately,” “about,” “generally,” and “substantially” may refer to an amount that is within less than 10% of, within less than 5% of, within less than 1% of, within less than 0.1% of, and/or within less than 0.01% of the stated amount. As another example, in certain embodiments, the terms “generally parallel” and “substantially parallel” or “generally perpendicular” and “substantially perpendicular” refer to a value, amount, or characteristic that departs from exactly parallel or perpendicular, respectively, by less than or equal to 15 degrees, 10 degrees, 5 degrees, 3 degrees, 1 degree, or 0.1 degree.

Although a few embodiments of the disclosure have been described in detail above, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this disclosure. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the claims. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments described may be made and still fall within the scope of the disclosure. It should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with, or substituted for, one another in order to form varying modes of the embodiments of the disclosure. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the disclosure herein should not be limited by the particular embodiments described above. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system, comprising: a wireline shifting tool comprising an anchor and a shifter; and a wireline shifting tool control system configured to receive one or more measurements associated with the wireline shifting tool and to adjust operation of the wireline shifting tool based on the one or more measurements; and wherein the one or more measurements comprise completion map data, and wherein the wireline shifting tool control system is configured to cause a graphical user interface (GUI) to display a processed completion map and adjust the operation of the wireline shifting tool based on the processed completion map.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the wireline shifting tool comprises a smart shifting tool, a selective shifting tool, or a completion shifting tool.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more measurements are indicative of a pressure applied to one or more of the shifter, the anchor, or a linear actuator of the wireline shifting tool; and wherein the wireline shifting tool control system is configured to cause the GUI to display pressure information related to the pressure applied to the one or more of the shifter, the anchor, or the linear actuator.
 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the wireline shifting tool is configured to adjust a position of the shifter based on the one or more measurements indicative of the pressure exceeding a threshold.
 5. The system of claim 3, wherein the wireline shifting tool control system is configured to determine an open diameter of the shifter based on the pressure applied to the shifter and to cause a graphical user interface (GUI) to display the open diameter.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the wireline shifting tool comprises a linear actuator configured to adjust a position of the shifter relative to the anchor, and wherein the one or more measurements are indicative of an axial force applied by the linear actuator.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more measurements comprise completion map data, and wherein the wireline shifting tool control system is configured to: receive one or more depth tool measurements; generate a wireline position output based on the completion map data and the one or more depth tool measurements; and cause a graphical user interface (GUI) to display information based on the wireline position output.
 8. A method, comprising: receiving, via a processor, one or more parameters indicating an amount of force to be applied to a wireline shifting tool; adjusting, via the processor, operation of the wireline shifting tool; receiving, via the processor, an indication of a force applied to a component of the wireline shifting tool; determining, via the processor, that the force applied to the component exceeds a threshold; and setting, via the processor, a shifter of the wireline shifting tool based on the force applied to the component exceeding the threshold.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the component comprises a linear actuator, a shifter, an anchor, or a combination thereof.
 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the one or more parameters comprise a seek pressure limit, a shift pressure limit, an anchor open force limit, a latch force limit, or a combination thereof.
 11. The method of claim 8, further comprising displaying, via the processor, a graphical user interface (GUI) indicating an open inner diameter of the shifter, a pressure applied by the force, or both.
 12. The method of claim 8, wherein adjusting operation of the wireline shifting tool comprises applying a force to a linear actuator of the wireline shifting tool causing the linear actuator to extend.
 13. The method of claim 8, wherein adjusting operation of the wireline shifting tool comprises applying a force causing the shifter to expand.
 14. The method of claim 8, further comprising generating an operational report based on the indication of the force applied to the component of the wireline shifting tool.
 15. The method of claim 8, wherein setting the shifter comprises selecting a linear actuator axial force limit to cause a sliding sleeve coupled to the shifter to start shifting.
 16. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising computer-executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, are configured to cause the processor to: receive one or more parameters indicating an amount of force to be applied to a wireline shifting tool; determine an operational adjustment to be made to the wireline shifting tool based on the one or more parameters; display a graphical user interface (GUI) comprising information associated with the operational adjustment; and adjust operation of the wireline shifting tool in accordance with the operational adjustment and the information displayed on the GUI.
 17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to adjust the operation of the wireline shifting tool by: activating one or more solenoids of the wireline shifting tool; identifying a clogged solenoid of the one or more solenoids; activating a motor associated with the one or more solenoids; and deactivating the clogged solenoid subsequent to activating the motor.
 18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to determine the operational adjustment by selecting a linear actuator axial force limit above a force that would cause a sliding sleeve coupled to a shifter of the wireline shifting tool to shift.
 19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein the one or more parameters comprise the amount of force applied to one or more shifters of the wireline shifting tool.
 20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to generate a graphic user interface (GUI) indicating an offset between the wireline shifting tool and a target location along a borehole that includes the wireline shifting tool. 